Week 5 – Cultural Studies: Barker; Chp. 9

Barker raised the concept of race and ethnicity here, particularly in a manner that I would not have approached. He first laid out that race as an identity marker was born out of poor and invalid biological underpinnings, and that ethnicity came about later as a manner of communities marked by shared signs and symbols. (250) But what was most significant for me in this was his argument that the marks of race/ethnicity are descriptive of the user’s ethnicity, not the other’s. It is a reactive defininition or marker, as opposed to explicitly self-described. (250) It also carries with it universal assumptions about the self that is using the marker as an identity.


~ by Brian Shope on February 10, 2008.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: